\nNomadic communities occupy a central place in many conflict areas in West Africa, particularly in the Sahel and in border zones. Their role is often reduced to clich\u00e9s \u2013 \u201caccomplices of jihadists\u201d, \u201ctraffickers\u201d, \u201crebels\u201d \u2013 that fail to reflect the diversity of situations or the social, economic and political dynamics running through them.\n<\/p>\n
\nUnderstanding their place in conflicts means seeing them at once as actors, victims and sometimes mediators, at the intersection of local dynamics (land, pastoralism, governance) and regional ones (trafficking, insurgencies, military interventions).\n<\/p>\n
\nThe term \u201cnomadic communities\u201d covers varied realities: transhumant herders, groups with seasonal mobility, itinerant traders, but also communities historically structured around high mobility (Tuareg, Peul\/Fulani, Toubou, Arabs, etc.). In many Sahelian countries, these populations practise pastoral<\/em> mobility (moving livestock according to seasons and resources) or commercial<\/em> mobility (caravan routes, formal and informal cross-border trade).\n<\/p>\n \nThis mobility is not only economic. It carries issues of identity, social status, and relationship to territory and to the state. It is part of a long history of negotiation with central authorities, customary authorities and other rural communities (sedentary farmers, semi-nomadic groups, etc.).\n<\/p>\n \nNumerous research studies and reports by international organisations converge on one finding: nomadic communities are frequently marginalised in state arrangements. Several dimensions accumulate:\n<\/p>\n \nThis marginalisation fuels a sense of injustice, sometimes reinforced by direct experiences of violence: abuses by security forces, confiscation of land or transhumance corridors, abusive taxation at markets and checkpoints, stigmatisation in the media and in public discourse.\n<\/p>\n \nIn this context, some segments of these communities may perceive armed movements \u2013 whether insurgent, community-based or jihadist \u2013 as opportunities for protection, revenge or a reshaping of local power relations.\n<\/p>\n \nNomadic communities cannot be reduced to the status of passive victims. In several Sahelian conflicts, individuals and segments of these communities have played an active role in:\n<\/p>\n \nThis participation nevertheless remains partial and fragmented. Not all nomadic communities engage in violence, and within the same group trajectories vary widely: some join armed groups, others flee them, while others try to remain neutral, often under heavy pressure.\n<\/p>\n \nThe mobility of nomadic communities is embedded in long-standing economic networks, which combine:\n<\/p>\n \nArmed groups \u2013 jihadists, militias, organised bandits \u2013 often seek to capture these flows by imposing \u201ctaxes\u201d on routes, markets or transhumance corridors. Nomadic communities then find themselves:\n<\/p>\n \nThis ambiguous position \u2013 both vulnerable and strategic \u2013 fuels perceptions of collusion, sometimes exaggerated or exploited by other groups or by certain segments of the state.\n<\/p>\n \nA significant share of the tensions involving nomadic communities is rooted in conflicts over the use of natural resources<\/strong>:\n<\/p>\n \nThese local tensions can become \u201cmilitarised\u201d when armed groups position themselves as protectors of one side against another, or when community militias form along lines perceived as \u201cethnic\u201d or \u201cidentity-based\u201d. Nomadic communities can thus be:\n<\/p>\n \nThe identity dimension is real, but it is bound up with very concrete issues of land, water, herd security and control of rural markets.\n<\/p>\n \nDespite their involvement in some episodes of violence, many nomadic communities also play a role in mediation<\/strong> and social regulation<\/strong>. Several factors contribute to this:\n<\/p>\n \nIn some areas, local agreements between herders and farmers have helped reduce violence around transhumance, provided they are recognised by the authorities and benefit from a minimum of security. Intercommunal dialogue initiatives have also highlighted nomadic actors as key interlocutors, particularly for restoring trust and clarifying rules of access to resources.\n<\/p>\n \nThese experiences nevertheless remain fragile, often threatened by the resumption of military operations, the arrival of new armed groups or the politicisation of local issues in the run-up to elections or changes of power.\n<\/p>\n \nNational and international security responses have a direct impact on nomadic communities. Several trends are observed in recent studies:\n<\/p>\n \nWhen security policies do not take into account the specific nature of pastoral and commercial mobility, they can reinforce the marginalisation of nomadic communities, fuel grievances and, indirectly, facilitate recruitment by armed groups.\n<\/p>\n \nThe role of nomadic communities in conflicts cannot be reduced to a single dimension. They are at once:\n<\/p>\n \nFor institutional actors and organisations engaged in conflict prevention, several lines of analysis emerge:\n<\/p>\n \nHow states, international organisations and local actors address these issues will help shape the course of conflicts: towards an escalation of tensions, or towards better integration of nomadic communities into regional political, economic and security arrangements.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Nomadic communities occupy a central place in many conflict areas in West Africa, particularly in the Sahel and in border zones. Their role is often reduced to clich\u00e9s \u2013 \u201caccomplices of jihadists\u201d, \u201ctraffickers\u201d, \u201crebels\u201d \u2013 that fail to reflect the diversity of situations or the social, economic and political dynamics running through them. Understanding their […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"acteur":[158,156],"niveau":[173],"risque":[170,172],"thematique":[163,166],"zone":[144,149],"class_list":["post-77100","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","acteur-non-state-armed-groups","acteur-states-and-public-institutions","niveau-analytical-level","risque-political-risks","risque-social-and-reputational-risks","thematique-governance-and-political-transitions","thematique-society-youth-and-radicalisation","zone-burkina-faso","zone-niger"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77100","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77100"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77100\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"acteur","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/acteur?post=77100"},{"taxonomy":"niveau","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/niveau?post=77100"},{"taxonomy":"risque","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/risque?post=77100"},{"taxonomy":"thematique","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/thematique?post=77100"},{"taxonomy":"zone","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahel.watch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/zone?post=77100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Populations often marginalised by the state<\/h2>\n
\n
Actors, not only victims: participation in armed groups<\/h2>\n
\n
Between the informal economy, trafficking and strategic routes<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
Land disputes and rivalries with sedentary communities<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
Nomadic communities as mediators and peace relays<\/h2>\n
\n
Effects of security policies and external interventions<\/h2>\n
\n
Strategic issues for the future<\/h2>\n
\n
\n